Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta | December 2000 |
NMR News 2000-06 Editor: Albin.Otter@ualberta.ca http://nmr.chem.ualberta.ca There are no fixed publishing dates for this newsletter; its appearance solely depends on whether there is a need to present information to the users of the spectrometers or not. |
Other content of this NMR News is no longer meaningful and has been removed April 2010.
Contents
Link page added Solvents and
techniques update (GDQF- and GTQF-COSY) As the names imply, some filtering is going on. i.e. you will
see less signals than with a simple GCOSY experiment. How much less is described here and
supplemented by examples,
a
summary Table and the pulse sequence is depicted as well. A little bit of patience is a necessity for these techniques. By far the most useful of the two is the
double quantum filtered version. It filters out all signals that are not coupled to anything else, in
other words singlets. First and foremost this is the
HDO residual signal but CDCl3 works as
well. In fact, the removal of the HDO signal is so efficient that a signal hidden
underneath the solvent peak, as long as it is not a singlet itself, will
(magically!) appear. This is
also useful when there are lots of signals from uncoupled methyl groups. These very
intense peaks often create undesired t1-noise that can interfere with the data analysis.
The GDQF-COSY will eliminate them all at once. 2D
processing: when to use what command |
Comparisons: GCOSY vs. GDQF-COSY and GCOSY vs. GTQF-COSY
This is a GCOSY without any presaturation of the HDO signal. | Note the complete elimination of the large HDO peak as well as two singlets near the middle of the spectrum. The selectivity can best be seen in the projection above the 2D. The three doublets (D) are not removed by the filtration, neither are signals with more complicated coupling patterns. |
This is the same GCOSY as above
(reproduced here for easy side-by-side comparison). |
In addition to the singlets, also all doublets are filtered out. Note that the s/n ratio is substantially worse (best seen in the projection). |
The gradient-enhanced double-quantum-filtered COSY pulse sequence
A summary of the filtering effect of the GDQF- and GTQF-COSY techniques on carbohydrates in comparison to the GCOSY
GCOSY | GDQF-COSY | GTQF-COSY | ||||
ring protons | diagonal |
cross |
diagonal |
cross |
diagonal |
cross |
H1 |
Y |
H2 |
Y |
H2 |
N |
N |
H2 |
Y |
H1 H3 |
Y |
H1 H3 |
Y |
N |
H3 |
Y |
H2 H4 |
Y |
H2 H4 |
Y |
N |
H4 |
Y |
H3 H5 |
Y |
H3 H5 |
Y |
N |
H5 |
Y |
H4 |
Y |
H4 |
Y |
H6a H6b |
H6a |
Y |
H5 H6b |
Y |
H5 H6b |
Y |
H5 H6b |
H6b |
Y |
H5 H6a |
Y |
H5 H6a |
Y |
H5 H6a |
H5 (Fuc) |
Y |
(H4) CH3 |
Y |
CH3 |
Y |
N |
CH3 (Fuc) |
Y |
H5 |
Y |
H5 |
N |
N |
CH3 (NAc) |
Y |
- |
N |
- |
N |
- |
COOCH3 (grease) |
Y |
- |
N |
- |
N |
- |
HDO |
Y |
- |
N |
- |
N |
- |